LAKE CX239 – THE LAKE MOST ENTHUSIASTS SHOULD WEAR
There’s a narrative of late that too many past-our-thirties enthusiasts ride pro-style race bikes that don’t fit properly without adding a chimney of headset spacers, giving a race bike a foolish look and deadening its responsiveness.
Instead, we should ride all-road bikes, formerly known as endurance bikes, that require less modification, look more natural, provide greater comfort on longer rides over typical variable road surfaces, and cost less.
I reached a similar conclusion, happily so, after testing the Lake CX239, the company’s newest shoe with its Competition last. It’s a supremely comfortable shoe with ample room across the forefoot and in the toe box. At the same time, it provides enough heel hold and sole stiffness to ensure you feel in control of a high-performance road shoe.
A STANDARD-SIZED, ENTHUSIAST’S FIT
My experience with the Lake CX332, the predecessor to its current CX333 and top Race last shoe, left me wanting more, both literally and figuratively. In its Regular width, the model’s toe box, forefoot, and heel cup are narrower, and it has less overall volume than most modern race shoes. Its soft leather upper, while very handsome, feels too relaxed for the race-stiff outsole performance-fit characteristics of the rest of the shoe.
Lake has always been known as one of the few bike shoe brands that offers a full range of wide sizes for its top models. However, since I have a middle-of-the-bell-curve D-width foot, switching to a wide model for more forefoot and toe box room would likely also mean a wider heel cup, where I want to feel securely locked in.
For my feet, the Lake CX239 seems a fitting compromise (pun intended) between its CX333 and the expertise gained in designing shoes for riders with wide feet, while still providing a performance fit in the heel.
A VERSATILE SHOE
The CX239’s situational range is impressive. When its BOA Li2 dials are cranked down, the power transfer matches that of the best road shoes I’ve tested.
And, if you ease off on the dials a bit, the room in your forefoot and toe box areas, along with the supple, not-too-thin, not-too-thick leather, makes for a comfortable ride. You still get a secure heel cup and well-distributed closure tension through the top, down, and bottom quadrants of your pedal stroke.
There’s also enough room to wear these shoes with thick fall or winter socks, yet the uppers feature plenty of pen-hole-sized vents to keep them comfortable on all but the warmest summer days.
On both sides of your forefoot, the leather is cut out and replaced with stretchy mesh fabric panels. This provides extra room if you need it while wearing thicker socks or if you have bunions. The panels also allow for enhanced cooling.
It’s essential to get good aftermarket insoles for the Lake CX239 to enjoy all of the versatility and comfort I’ve described. The insoles that come with these, as with most bike shoes, aren’t supportive enough.
However, you’ll need a slightly wider insole than the Body Geometry ones I use. The shape of the forefoot and toe areas isn’t as wide as the shoes in those regions, leaving a few millimeters uncovered and causing some misalignment. I’m still searching for a better solution and may end up opting for a custom insole as part of my long-term testing.
A WIDE LOOK
Key elements of the Lake CX239 make it appear almost like clogs, looking wider than it actually feels for my comfortable feet inside.
Each shoe features a flap that tucks under the upper on the shoe’s outer side. Two high-quality BOA Li2 dials and three wire guides are positioned relatively far apart across the uppers.
The wire guides are aligned as if they are just beyond where the inside edge of the uppers would be if the shoes had tongues. Additionally, the pen holes in the centers of the uppers enhance the illusion that the shoes have tongues.
Finally, the toe area of the shoes seems more rounded than the usual oval shape of road bike shoes.
All of this results in overly wide, boxy-looking shoes. In my opinion, it’s not the most attractive shape. The leather looks like (and is) quality material, which offsets some of the shoes’ less appealing aesthetics.
FUNCTIONAL PERFORMANCE
Three additional performance features of road bike shoes are worth highlighting on the Lake CX239.
First, while the BOA Li2 closure system has become an expected standard on top-tier road shoes, it’s only as effective in tensioning the shoe and preventing hot spots as the placement of the dials and guides by the shoe designer.
Lake has nailed the BOA placement on the CX239. Additionally, there is a generous layer of padding on the underside of the flap to evenly distribute the tension across the midfoot.
Secondly, robust impact protection is discreetly integrated within the upper at the toe and stitched inside a scuff-resistant, suede-like fabric around the heel. This is a welcome departure, both functionally and aesthetically, from the external, plastic-looking moldings attached to the front and rear of some other shoes.
Finally, the 100% carbon fiber outsoles on the Lake CX239 are wide, avoiding the hourglass shape that some shoes adopt to save weight and reduce material costs. It seems only appropriate that shoes with a wide fit and aesthetic elements should also feature a wide outsole.
The toe pad is also quite wide, while the heel pad is standard size and has worn down quickly during my testing. Both pads are replaceable.
At 304 grams for a size EU43.5 shoe, the CX239 is heavier than most, comparable to top shoes from Sidi and Northwave that I’ve also reviewed. This is not surprising, considering Lake’s volume, leather upper, full-size carbon outsole, and excellent build quality. Even with about 50 grams more than other options, it does not significantly impact performance.
The Lake CX239 comes in white or black, regular or wide widths, and half sizes for US$350 or $315 or 10% off from BTD (BikeTiresDirect) with code ITK10.
In The Know Cycling is ad-free, subscription-free, and reader-supported. If you want to help keep it rolling without any added cost to you, buy your gear and kit after clicking the store links on the site. When you do, we may earn an affiliate commission that will help me cover the expenses to create and publish our independent, comprehensive, and comparative reviews. Thank you, Steve. Learn more.
See how these shoes compare to others in my review of The Best Road Cycling Shoes.
* * * * *
Thank you for reading. Please let me know what you think of anything I’ve written, or ask any questions you might have in the comment section below.
You can use either the pop-up form or the one located at the bottom of the sidebar to receive notifications when new posts are published. To see what gear and kit we’re testing or have just reviewed, follow us by clicking on the icons below.
Thanks, and enjoy your rides safely! Cheers, Steve



I just got my Lake CX239 X wide, in the white on white microfiber. The shoes are amazing. My pair weighs 275 grams per side, probably because its microfiber rather than leather. I had the 238 which these replaced, and those weighed 300 grams on the dot each. I loved the 238s a lot, but got destroyed in 2 crashes.
I normally wear 44cm shoes in normal widths, but got sized for 43.5 wide in Lake and it has been a true game changer. You can crank the boa down without pain points and everything stated in article really nails my experience. I just wish the overlap between the to sides were a little closer, but this isn’t an issue once you get the shoes on.
Making shoes look “attractive” by making them too narrow is exactly why so many people are uncomfortable in cycling shoes.
My bike fitter introduced me to Lake shoes as I have wide feet. Even the Sidi Megas were a compromise for me in the past. He measured my feet(with the same device any decent shoe shtore has) including width, finding my size in a Wide, as opposed to regular or extra wide. They have changed cycling for me. I now just put my shoes on and don’t even think about or notice them. They just work. BTW, I have the CX242, which are very pricey but worth it if you have bunions etc as they have independent panels that adjust to all of your feet’s irregularities.
Steve, do you mind if i ask what your actual foot measurement is? my typical size is much like yours (i frequently use Northwave in 43) but i also have a pair of Lake CX302’s that i had to purchase in a 44 despite the Lake sizing chart recommending 43.
My actual foot measurements are 266mm long x 100mm wide. +5mm in length for Lake sizing (271mm). The actual internal length of my CX302’s is 272mm.
I’m intrigued by the CX239’s. I do find Lake to be a comfortable shoe once you nail the size.
Nicholas, My feet measure around 270mm long and 105mm wide though it varies based on the grid I’m using and the day I’m measuring. Note that the 302s are a Race last and the 239s are a competition last so there’s more room around the toe box with the 239s. If you aren’t sure, I always suggest ordering a couple sizes and keep the one that fits you the way you like best. Steve
Steve, Did you have any issues with the redesigned upper closure of the CX239 starting to dig in and cause pain on the front side of your ankle where the tongue would be? If so, did the upper closure eventually break in and stop causing pain?
Jeff, I didn’t have this issue. My right front side ankle is sensitive to this issue and I’ve felt it on some shoes but not these. Steve
The Trek insoles fit nicely in the Lake 238. They are supportive and come in 3 arch heights and multiple sizes.