KNOWS NOTES – FITTING TUBELESS ROAD TIRES

The adoption of tubeless road tires and wheels for many cycling enthusiasts has not been easy.

Personally, I love the performance benefits tubeless brings me. More comfortable rides, better handling, lower rolling resistance, and almost no flats top my list. At the same time, I know there are many issues that cause some of you to come to hate tubeless and never know any of its benefits.

From what I can tell, loving or hating tubeless – and I don’t know many people who fall in between – is largely determined by your experience installing and maintaining tubeless road tires.

If you can get comfortable setting up and running the right combination of tubeless road tires and wheels, then you’ll love the benefits road tubeless gives you. If you can’t, nothing will overcome the dislike you develop trying to adapt to tubeless or the fear of dealing with a tubeless flat out on the road.

Yes, we can blame the industry for “hyping” technology that’s not ready for roadie time without first establishing standards. The reality, however, is that “standards” in the cycling world and in many other industries only come after years of adoption, if at all, are usually created in rather messy ways.

When one or two companies have a dominant share of the business, they use their market muscle to set the standard for what is acceptable design, performance, safety and other levels that smaller players follow. They will often dominate the standards issuing bodies or see those bodies adopt whatever levels they set. Helmet safety standards are a shameful example of this.

If there are no dominant players and no leaders appear to be emerging, years of negotiation between these competing players typically take place as part of the standards-setting committees they sit on. They are forced to work together to agree to some standards they can all meet to grow their business and have their individual investments pay off. This is what goes on in the cycling tire and wheelset market.

There are about a dozen sizeable companies making tubeless-ready road wheelsets and nearly as many, mostly different companies making tubeless road tires. So, we’ve got two fragmented sets of players that depend on each other to some degree for the ability to bring tubeless love (or hate) to road cycling enthusiasts.

None of these companies are in a position to dictate standards. So the discussions at cycling’s ISO and ETRTO standard’s setting committees continue at a speed that’s been way behind what is now two or three generations of new road tubeless wheelsets and tires.

It does me little good to blame the industry or wait for them to set (and follow) standards through these organizations. My goal, as it says at the top of every page of this site, is to figure out “What Cycling Gear to Get Next and Where to Get It” and share that with you.

The Challenge

My recent exchange with Alan, an In The Know Cycling reader, set me out on one of those “figure it out” challenges after he filed the following comment on my post The Best Tubeless Tires.

I found it impossible to mount the Conti 5000 TL on Mavic Kysirium Elite UST wheels. My local bike shop techies who are extremely experienced and professional failed as well.  Even though a Continental rep at RideLondon registration in August assured me that they would fit, I have now received a message from Continental stating that the tyre and wheel are incompatible!

Luckily my supplier has agreed to refund on the unopened tyre but not the attempted mounting one. So I am now left with an expensive tyre of no use to me and non-refundable; thanks Continental.

I didn’t immediately approve Alan’s comment (all first-time posters have to go through “moderation”). I was surprised by it (I’ll explain why below), wanted to learn more about his experience, and then add an informed response to his comment.

Was this incompatibility Conti’s fault, as Alan’s comment concluded? The Mavic UST or Universal System Tubeless had been heralded by Mavic and the cycling industry press as “easier to use and safer than existing tubeless systems” when it was introduced in 2017.

While not dominant in the wheelset industry anymore, certainly Mavic is well respected for the volume and quality of wheelsets they build, if not for their technology leadership. They were clearly attempting to set a standard with UST and hoped other wheelset and tire companies would follow

Further, this Conti tire had already been flagged by ENVE as one that shouldn’t be used with their hookless rimmed SES 4.5 AR and 3.4 AR disc wheels.

The Continental Grand Prix 5000 TL was the tire I had recommended as the best tubeless tire. Maybe I had it wrong? If so, I wanted to know that and get the word out to all readers.

I asked Alan to tell me more about the problems he’d had. He sent me the following helpful background about his experience and the photo you see at the top of this post.

I spent a hour at my local bike shop a couple of days ago trying to fit the tyre. I had already had several goes myself using the stretching the slack and finishing at the valve, also with tyre levers. The chaps at the shop are much stronger and have fitted many more tyres as me but hit the same problems as me. The tyres bead is far too tight and the best achieved as to have about 6” of rim left to go on.

He also sent me a copy of the email he’d received from the Continental Bicycle Tyres UK rep.

Hi Alan, If you could return them to your place of purchase for a refund, that
particular wheelset will only run with mavic ust tyres, this is down to
mavic’s design that does not comply with the etrto standard and nothing we
can do about it. Kind Regards, Rich

 

Oh, this was getting ugly, at least by polite British norms. Conti blaming Mavic for not living up to ETRTO standards? Yet Mavic is one of the chief funders of the ETRTO bicycle standards section and cites ETRTO in the size of all of their rims, including Alan’s Ksyrium Elite UST wheels (“ETRTO size: 622x17TC ROAD”).

This was getting uncomfortable for me. See, in addition to recommending the Continental Grand Prix 5000 TL, I had also picked the Mavic Ksyrium Elite UST wheels as the Best Value in my Best Road Disc Wheelset Upgrades post and had called the ENVE 4.5 AR Disc wheelset the Best Performer in my Best Carbon Disc Wheelset post.

How could I recommend all of these if they didn’t work together?

The (Second) Experiment

I reached out to my friend Don who had a set of the same Mavic Ksyrium Elite UST wheels that Alan was struggling with. Don had come to hate tubeless and had given up on these wheels. He lent me his front wheel. (His back wheel had been trashed after he hit a pothole while riding at low pressure).

I also asked Alan if he was using a 25C size Conti tire to make sure I had the same combination he and his shop had tried to mount and that the Conti rep said were incompatible. His response added more context:

Hi Steve, Yes 25c tyres. I use Conti 4000 clinchers on my Zipp 303s and I am a big fan of their durability, puncture-resistance and grip. That’s why I wanted to use the 5000 on my Mavics. I had no confidence riding on the supplied Mavic tyres’ grip, especially after a slide off on a bend that the Conti’s would have handled easily.

I am hoping that I can find an alternative such as Vittoria or Specialised that can fit these wheels.  My local bike shop will help me with this and their fitting so should avoid wasting money on other no hopers!

Many thanks.

Cheers,

Alan

This got me thinking. Why don’t I do an installation test with a few different tires and wheels, including the ones Alan had tried, and see what happens. I did a similar experiment in my review of the best tubeless tires that had included the Mavic Comete UST wheelset, a deeper, wider carbon one and the same Yksion Pro UST tubeless tire that came with Alan’s Ksyrium Elite UST wheelset.

During that first experiment, I had successfully if not easily mounted three other tubeless road tires – the original 25C Schwalbe Pro One, a 28C Maxxis Padrone TR, and Zipp’s Tangente Speed RT25 (25C) along with the much-adored Conti GP 4000 tubed clincher on the Comete UST rim.

When I reviewed the all-around, carbon Mavic Cosmic Pro SL UST wheelset (here), I had also successfully mounted and tested that wheelset with the Zipp Tangente Speed RT25 (tubeless) and the Conti GP 4000 (tubed) tires.

For this experiment of the Mavic Ksyrium Elite UST wheelset that Alan had tried to mount the Conti GP 5000 TL on, I grabbed both a new and used 25C size Conti GP5000 TL to try and a Zipp Tangente Speed RT25 tire that I had mounted successfully on the other UST wheels.

I also pulled out new 25C and used 28C sizes of the latest generation Schwalbe Pro One TLE (“Tubeless Easy”) tire that recently replaced the first generation Pro One tubeless which had been so popular. The Schwalbe rep had told me that the tire had been build to the emerging, yet still unofficial ISO/ETRTO standard for tubeless road tires.

Finally, to make this even more fun, I added a Zipp 303 NSW disc wheel that I had used in the earlier experiment and a HED Vanquish 4 wheel from a set I reviewed this summer. Both of these wheels and other all-arounds are compared in my Best Carbon Disc Wheelset post.

To briefly conclude an already too long story,

  • Other than the Yksion Pro UST tire that Mavic supplies with each UST wheelset, I couldn’t mount any of the tires from Zipp, Continental or Schwalbe on the Mavic Ksyrium Elite UST wheel.
  • All the tires, including the Yksion Pro UST, mounted rather easily on the HED and Zipp wheels.

When I say “I couldn’t mount”, I’m talking about the kind of mounting Alan and I attempted and that most enthusiasts would try in our own workshops when setting up a new set of tires or out on the road should we ever need to remount a tire after putting a tube in to account for an unsealable tire cut.

And when I say “mounted rather easily”, I’m talking about mounting the tire by hand within 30 seconds for most and 2 minutes with the aid of a tire lever at one spot on the rim for the Conti GP 5000 TL.

Interestingly, the Yksion Pro UST mounted within 30 seconds with no lever on the Zipp and HED wheels but it took me 2 minutes with the aid of a tire lever at one spot on the rim to get it on the Mavic Kysrium Elite UST wheel that it’s made for.

The Explanation

So why could I not get any tire other than the Yksion Pro UST on the Mavic Kysrium Elite UST while I could mount tires from several other brands on the Mavic Comete UST and Mavic Cosmic Pro SL UST wheels?

I don’t do science but I do do observation and deduction. And if you think that my use of the words “do do” before observation and deduction suggest this is all a bunch of crap, well I’m sorry. I’m generally skeptical of the claims I hear from cycling industry companies about how great their technology and products are so I’m left to do these kinds of experiments to figure things out.

Here’s how I explain the results of this experiment.

Wider rims making mounting tires easier – The Mavic Kysrium Elite UST wheelset has an inside rim width measured across the rim hooks of 16.7 mm. The other wheels in the experiment had inside rim widths ranging from 19 to 21 mm. In the case of all the rims tested, I clearly observed that the wider the rim, the wider the channel in the center of the rim.

The Mavic rim channel measured about 8.5 mm wide from edge to edge. The HED rim channel was nearly twice as wide at 16mm.

The HED Vanquish 4 wheelset has a rim channel width nearly double that of the Mavic Kysrium Elite UST

With a wider channel, more of the second bead of the tire is going to stay in the channel alongside the first as you mount it than it would with a narrower channel. The channel depth effectively reduces the tire rim’s circumference by enough to make mounting a modern tire where both beads can fit in that channel pretty easy. Without a channel or without being able to get that second bead into the channel, you’re not likely to be able to mount your tire at all.

Wider tire beads make mounting tires harder – The Continental Grand Prix 5000 TL’s bead is clearly the widest of the four tires tested. It measures about 4mm while the Zipp and Schwalbe (about 3.3mm) and Yksion (2.9mm) are narrower.

Tubeless Road Tires

The bead width, stiffness, and profile of each tire are different, though it’s hard to know how big an effect this has in mounting

This is likely why it took me a bit longer and required a lever for me to mount the Conti than the others on the wheels with the wider channel. It may also explain in part why the Yksion went on the Kysrium Elite whereas the others couldn’t. I say “likely” and “in part” because, while I can’t quantify it, each tire’s bead stiffness and profile in addition to their widths seem different enough to have some effect on how easy or hard the mounting was. At least that’s what my thumbs were telling me.

I don’t think, however, that the bead width, stiffness or profile was as big a contributor to mounting as was the rim channel width. And, I would suspect the bead design is driven by getting the tire to seal and stay in place once on the rim than getting it on that rim in the first place.

Wheelset depth, tire size, tire age all matter little – Shouldn’t it be easier to get the same tire on a shallower rim as it doesn’t have as far to go over the edge of the rim?  Shouldn’t a wider tire or an older one be easier to mount on the same rim because they have more slack either because of their size or being a bit stretched out due to their age?

Apparently not. Rim beds and channels typically sit at about the same depth relative to the top of the rim wall regardless of rim’s overall depth. And size or age doesn’t appear to make for any more room or stretch.

A UST designation is not important, at least to the ability to mount a tire – Despite Mavic’s UST claims, I haven’t found any significant difference mounting UST vs. non-UST tires on UST rims with the exception of the Ksyrium Elite UST rim and UST tire combination. While we can debate some of the other claimed benefits of UST, making mounting easier wasn’t a significant or even noticeable benefit of UST in my experiments. In my first experiment, I actually found it took longer and more tire levering to mount both the UST tire and non-UST tires on the Comete UST wheel than it did to put them on the Zipp.

Either way, to Alan and the rest of you that own the Ksyrium Elite UST wheelset, I would suspect the Vittoria or Specialized or other current 25C tubeless road tires may not easily fit on your wheels.

That said, I don’t think the Yksion Pro UST tires are bad. In my ride testing, I found they were are a big improvement over the prior generation of non-UST Yksion tires.

What Else Matters

While mounting a tubeless tire is a make or break consideration to even consider tubeless, if we were to choose between tires based on this alone we’d be missing a lot about what makes some tubeless tires better for you than others.

There other installation considerations – how easily does a tire inflate on the rim, how well does it seal, how long does it hold air? I answer these questions in the experiment section of the tubeless tire review I’ve referred and provided a link to above.

You’ll also find explanations of the five performance criteria that matter most in choosing between tubeless road tires in that review. In no particular order, they are

  1. Rolling resistance
  2. Puncture resistance
  3. Road feel
  4. Aerodynamics
  5. Durability

And then, of course, there are price differences between tubeless tires that will help you choose between them.

But, if we were to choose only between tubeless road tires for the above reasons and not consider how well a tire works with your wheelset together, that would be a big mistake as Alan and I, unfortunately, found out.

Beyond the difficulty of mounting a tire, how well the tire bead works with the rim hook determines how well it seals and holds air. And, as I mentioned earlier, some tubeless tires aren’t recommended for use with certain hookless rimmed wheels.

You should also pick your tubeless tire size knowing your rim width based on whether you prioritize for comfort, handling or aerodynamics or some combination of them. I wrote this post about that subject for tubed clincher tires a few years ago but it applies equally well for tubeless ones.

Recommending Tubeless Road Tires and Wheels

Some of you may be wondering: How can you recommend a tire like the Conti GP 5000 TL and wheels like the Mavic Ksyrium Elite UST or ENVE 4.5 AR that don’t work together?

Well, I’m recommending specific tires and wheels separately rather than in combination. I have also written, as in the case I mentioned just above, about the importance of considering tires and wheels together and given you some sizing if not product recommendations on those combinations based on your priorities.

In the same way, I’ve also recommended how to choose what type of wheels you should consider (e.g. upgrade alloy, carbon all around, aero, etc.) based on your riding profile, goals and budget. You can see that post here.

All of that said, I know there are some tubeless tires and wheels that don’t work together. While I can’t check out every or even most combinations, I will go back through my tubeless tire review and add some specific recommendations about which tires I know don’t work with specific wheels or categories of wheels.

Hopefully, that will help those of you like Alan avoid the hassle he’s gone through and make better decisions from the start.

Share Your Experience

To help me and your fellow road cycling enthusiasts with this, I’d love to read about your experiences installing and maintaining tubeless road tires. You can use the comment section below to tell us what’s worked or not worked for you.

Answers to these kinds of questions would be great.

  • What tubeless-ready wheels and tires do you use?
  • How long did it take you and what techniques did you use to get your tires on your wheels?
  • Did they seal with a track pump or did you use a compressor?
  • How much sealant do you put in? How much pressure do you lose between rides?
  • What kind of sealant do you use? How often do you top off or replace your sealant?
  • Have you had a puncture that didn’t seal on the road? How did you deal with it?
  • Do you love or hate tubeless? Why?

And lastly, if you haven’t tried tubeless yet but are thinking about it, tell me what questions you need to be answered to help you make a decision.

*      *      *      *

That’s it for now. Thanks for reading and supporting the site. To keep in touch with what I’m posting and your fellow roadies are commenting on, use the popup form to get an email when new posts come out and the icons at the top to follow me on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram. There’s also an icon you can click to get posts sent to your RSS reader.

Thanks and enjoy your riding safely.

Originally published: October 30, 2019

In The Know Cycling supports you and your fellow enthusiasts by doing hours of independent and comparative analysis to find the best road cycling gear and kit to improve your riding experience.

You support us and save yourself money and time by buying anything at all through the links to stores we’ve picked for their low prices and high customer satisfaction. Some of these stores pay us a small commission when you buy there after clicking on these links. Thank you.

Read more about who we are, what we do and why.

42 comments

  • Let me answer the initial questions as I haven’t ridden enough to talk about my satisfaction.

    What tubeless-ready wheels and tires do you use?

    Roval CL 32 (same as CLX32s, with DT350 instead of DT240 hubs and non-aero spokes). Discs.
    Continental GP5000 TL 28″

    How long did it take you and what techniques did you use to get your tires on your wheels?

    Getting them onto the wheel was painful (strength and curse words required) but doable if I kept at it. Not sure how long it took, but I’d guess 20 minutes per wheel is a reasonable estimate for next time.

    Did they seal with a track pump or did you use a compressor?

    This entire process was a huge pain in the butt – I almost sold the tires and went back to tubed. I don’t have a compressor so I tried a track pump initially. That got me nowhere. I then used a CO2 cartridge until the tires felt somewhat firm and I heard the “cracks” that hinted the tire had become seated into the wheel. I tried to put in sealant next but I realized that the tire would not stay seated in the wheel, meaning I had wasted the cartridge for nothing. I read a review on CyclingTips that mentioned this issue – it’s the Roval wheels, not the tires, that cause this; tubeless tires do not stay seated in the wheels without pressure.

    I needed to put the sealant in first and then pump up the tires. I didn’t have any more cartridges (I’d used a bunch trying to figure this issue out) so I found a local gas station with paid air compressors.

    After an hour I noticed the tires becoming softer and overnight, the tire went completely soft. I believe the tire had remained seated, but I knew this wasn’t going to a ride-able situation. I took the bike to a local bike shop to ask what I had done wrong but they didn’t see anything wrong. They suggested going out on a ride with it.

    They had pumped the tires, but this time the tires did not go soft right away and since then the tires have been been fine. (I actually pumped the tires a few times between the initial time and the bike shop, but am not sure how many times)

    I left the bike alone a month before actually riding it outdoors but the tires remained seated. For next time, maybe I do need to ride it or pump it up a few times at high pressures and wait for the tires to stabilize? I did rotate the tires quite a bit during initial inflation for the sealant to take hold in the tire/wheel gaps.

    How much sealant do you put in? How much pressure do you lose between rides?

    About 60ML of Stan’s NoTubes Tire Sealant. My first (and only) ride on the the tires were 4 days ago; I’ve lost about 10% in tire pressure (I run 50/60 PSI, front and rear) since then.

    What kind of sealant do you use? How often do you top off or replace your sealant?

    Have you had a puncture that didn’t seal on the road? How did you deal with it?

    Do you love or hate tubeless? Why?

  • Thank you for the best summary of the state of road tubeless anywhere, at least that I can find. In doing some digging on the newest Schwalbe pro 1 TLE, this company links to a diagram entitled “the optimum wheel for Schwalbe tubeless road tires”, found here: https://www.schwalbe.com/en/tubeless-requirements
    Since this newest tire is claimed to be ETRTO compliant, can we assume this diagram is essentially the new, and mysteriously not yet announced, set of standards for wheels, or just a stopgap to assist potential buyers for this tire? Like many others planning a new build, the current wild west as it has been described for tubeless is seriously clouding purchase decisions on what are not inexpensive components.

    • Colin, Thanks for your kind feedback. Much appreciated. As to the new Schwalbe Pro 1 TLE, I think Schwalbe is trying to get ahead of things by making this tire to what they believe discussions suggest to them will be the new ETRTO tubeless tire standard. I’m not aware that there is a new standard yet nor what it might be. And, the current standard describes the range of tire sizes for a given rim size rather than specify the rim size and all the rim dimensions like shown in the diagram you linked to.

      I don’t have any inside info on what the new standard will be but I do know that while a hooked, 17C rim is common now, especially on alloy stock and upgrade wheels, it is narrow compared to rim widths that have seemed to coalesced around 19C for carbon road rim brake wheels and 21C for carbon road disc brake wheels. And a good number, though still a minority of disc brake wheels are hookless at 21C and even more at 23C and 25C.

      The reality is that these things are evolutionary. What we’ve seen is that over 4-5 years rims get wider, tires follow, bike frame chainstays and forks get wider to accommodate them and then the whole 4-5 year process starts all over again. Throw market developments like gravel, where everything is more comfortable at even wider sizes and riders who want one wheelset they can ride (with different tires) on both paved and unpaved roads on top of standards bodies that move like molasses and there’s little to be gained from waiting for ETRTO and their already decades out of date tire standards.

      What does that mean for you and your fellow road cycling enthusiasts? First, I would consider the best tire after you first pick the best wheelset for what you want to do and knowing that it will fit your bike. Picking a tire first is bass-ackward. I’ve written extensively about wheels and tires and recently about 2020 bikes so you can check out those.

      Second, watch for developments and field reports. I’ve written about actual tire sizes on different size wheels before (see this Know’s Notes post) and will update those from time to time. FYI, the new 28C Pro One TLE measured 27.7mm wide on my 21C Zipp 303 NSW disc demo wheelset and 27.5mm on the 21C i9.45. The 25C Pro One TLE measured 26.1mm and 26.5 respectively on the same wheelset, both hooked and all at 80psi. I didn’t ride each combination extensively but for the ones I did, I rode them at about 60 psi and had no issues (though they aren’t my preferred tubeless tires).

      Third, don’t wait on ETRTO. They will probably be designed for the lowest common denominator highest sales volume wheels (e.g. stock wheels) while most enthusiast-level wheelsets will already be far ahead and evolving much faster. Steve

      • Steve to be clear I am not focused on the Schwalbe tire, just curious if they were hinting as to rim standards which are the important piece. And while you have done lots of useful measuring on width, I’m not too hung up on that either; in a new build it should be easy enough to ensure the max real tire/rim width will be large enough for your planned needs. Both Schwalbes and Mavic’s “ideal rim” actually leaves width open, it would really be specifying – this is what a hook should look like, a central valley, and a diameter with min/max acceptable variance. I think at least some of the “impossible mounting” situations, ie. Alan’s issue where you began this thread, is due to diameter issues as much as width. Mavic has claimed, in their UST tech threads, that existing wheel makers were in cases over 1mm larger than nominal 700c diameter, and further that some tubeless tire makers were cheating on the small end, ensuring safety at the expense of mounting. In the end, unmountable tubeless=useless tubeless, thats all I am looking to steer clear of. And real world “Steve notes that Schwalbe P1 fits easy on Zipp” is still hugely useful. Cheers and good riding:)

  • What tubeless-ready wheels and tires do you use?

    DT Swiss RC28C wheels, with Conti 5000 TL 25mm tires, Schwalbe Pro 1 25 and 28mm, many Hutchinson tubeless tires

    How long did it take you and what techniques did you use to get your tires on your wheels?Did they seal with a track pump or did you use a compressor?

    The Schwalbes go on with a hand pump. The Contis are devilish in that they hugely awkward to mount, and worse fall into the rim when deflated. The Contis required special valves that allow addition of sealant without deflating the tires.

    How much sealant do you put in? How much pressure do you lose between rides?50ml for 25mm, 60ml for 28mm. The Schwalbes held their pressure for days. The Contis require airing daily.

    What kind of sealant do you use? How often do you top off or replace your sealant?

    Stans. I replenish every 3 months.

    Have you had a puncture that didn’t seal on the road? How did you deal with it?

    I’ve had cuts that wouldn’t seal with the Schwalbes. I had to put in a tube to get home.

    Do you love or hate tubeless? Why?

    I love and hate it. I was an early adopter with the first Hutchinson tubeless tires and abandoned the technology as hopelessly immature; the tires were hugely heavy, rode like bricks, the sealant corroded my beautiful Dura Ace tubeless rims which Shimano refused to warrant. I’m a hater because this technology hugely punished early adopters and ten years later the punishment continues!

    I came back to tubeless with the new crop of much better tires. I’m sticking with it for now because of the greater safety promised by this technology. Clincher blow outs are scary and dangerous. I ride entirely in places with huge climbs which means huge descents and that is when a blow out is more than scary. The prospect of a tubeless tire which stays on the rim is what brought me to this tech in the first place.

    But the problems continue, the new Schwalbe tires wear like butter, and the new Contis are truly awful to mount. Worse, the rim/tire incompatibilities seriously undermine the safety claims for tubeless. Leonard Zinn has written several times in his tech column about this, and has landed on the idea that the original Mavic standard is necessary to ensure safety. The reader accounts cited there about catastrophic deflation due to rim/tire incompatibility are chilling. Rationally, it appears that this tech still is not ready. I’m still willing to consider it because I regard clinchers as obviously dangerous as well. I use Conti tubeless tires even though I’ve described them as simply infernal pretty much solely because I think that the fat bead used on this tire means it is probably going to stay on the rim longer in the case of a flat. But at this point, that is more a leap of faith than anything else.

  • Hi Steve, I have recently bought a set of ksyrium elite use wheels with the yksion pro wheels already on them. Having read the difficulty in attaching the conti 5000 tubeless wheels I would like to know how difficult it is to change to my preferred conti 4000 11 tubed clincher wheels, as I prefer tubes. Are they as difficult to get on the wheels as the 5000’s? Would be very grateful if you could advise me before I try.thanks Dave.

    • David, depends on the inside width of the wheels, whether they are UST rims or not, and what width tires you want to put on. If it’s close to the set up I’ve described above, not likely to work. If it’s 19C or wider, will work. Steve

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *